Huck Finn would think this is bullshit.

5 01 2011

Let me get this out of the way right at the start.

1.    I am not a fan of Mark Twain.  I think his writing is lazy and I think his stories are dull.  I think that if you want to read American fiction by a white fellow about a journey and the South you should read The Wild Palms by Faulkner.

◊  Or anything by Faulkner.
◊  I LOOOOVE Faulkner.

2.     I am not a fan of the word nigger.  I am using it in this post because I think that it is important in the context of the discussion but I don’t use it in polite company.  I don’t use it in impolite company.  I was brought up with a strict “Hit first ask questions later” policy with regard to the word ever being used to describe me.  I do not understand the desire to “reclaim” the word and I cringe when I hear people (of any race) using the “softer” version among themselves – particularly as a term of endearment.

So, you might think that I’d be relieved by the news that, because of the work of  Alan Gribben, a version of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is now being released by NewSouth Books replacing the word with “slave.”

The idea of a more politically correct Finn came to the 69-year-old English professor over years of teaching and outreach, during which he habitually replaced the word with “slave” when reading aloud. Gribben grew up without ever hearing the “n” word (“My mother said it’s only useful to identify [those who use it as] the wrong kind of people”) and became increasingly aware of its jarring effect as he moved South and started a family. “My daughter went to a magnet school and one of her best friends was an African-American girl. She loathed the book, could barely read it.”

My first response to this was an Imperial facepalm.

My second response to this was, well eat an apple and convince me to paint your fence you lazy bastard!

Thankfully  I’m not the only one who feels this way.

Indeed, Twain scholar Thomas Wortham, at UCLA, compared Gribben to Thomas Bowdler (who published expurgated versions of Shakespeare for family reading), telling PW that “a book like Professor Gribben has imagined doesn’t challenge children [and their teachers] to ask, ‘Why would a child like Huck use such reprehensible language?’”

But soon even that academically-supported righteousness wore off and I was left with the hard cold frightened nub of why this move bothers me so.

It important that The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (and, indeed any piece of literature) not be neutered for the sake of ease because – especially –  in this time of political revisionism art is one of the few things that we have to keep us honest.  It is important to keep a record of who are and who we were.

Replacing nigger with slave not only dilutes the text, it dilutes our history.  And that scares me.

Sure, people who were enslaved were referred to as slaves.  But  they were referred to as property, chattel, livestock and (specifically for those who were black and enslaved) nigger(s).   The use of the word is about power and privilege and was applied to all black people regardless of condition.

Because let’s be clear.  Slavery is a condition.  Nigger is a description, a qualifier.  This is an important distinction to me.  Black people all over our country didn’t hear slave as the last word that was said to them before they were lynched or humiliated and dehumanized in other forms.  They heard nigger.

Slavery is something that we abolished.  Something that we “overcame.”  Nigger is not.
In the novel Jim turns out to be a free man.  He won’t be called a slave anymore, but I bet he’ll still be called a nigger.

I accept that it’s difficult for people – especially children – to read novels filled with such an ugly word¹.  I dread having to explain the word to my future child.  But I am committed to doing it because I am committed to honesty.

It is too easy to remove the words and ideas that offend us from art and history.  It is too easy to give in to cowardice and hide our heads and dull our intellects in the sands of political correctness.

It is difficult to accept that our nation with all of its faults and warts and ugliness, its stops and starts  and shudders, is the nation the we love; the nation we make   It is emotionally wrenching and intellectually challenging to acknowledge that ours is a nation that is as much a reflection of its past as it is its hope for the future.
Nigger is a part of who we are.  And that is awful.  That is horrific.  That hurts me.  But that is the truth.

We must  preserve Huckleberry Finn (and other works) as they are to remind us of the work that we have done and to inspire us to do the work that we still have to do.  Especially in these tea-partying days.  We must do so because we are America, land of the brave.





¹I accept that it may have been difficult for some of you to read this post which filled with such an ugly word.  It was hard for me to write.




5 responses

6 01 2011

I full on agree. I don’t think erasing the word eliminates it. It just puts it into hiding, which is much scarier in my book.

6 01 2011
Baby Power Dyke

@ Cesa
I agree. The best disinfectant is sunlight.

6 01 2011
Elizabeth Alfred

I find it interesting that he felt it was necessary to change the book because it was making white people uncomfortable. He talks about his granddaughter’s strong reaction while her African-American best friend is merely a set piece.

It irritates me that some people call this “political correctness.” Trying to avoid the country’s white supremacist history has never been the goal of those who want people to recognize that words have meaning.

You describe it very well to call it cowardice, and with conservative factions trying to convince us our founders lived in halcyon days and knew best about everything, it’s not the time to be cowards about our history.

Reminds me of the Langston Hughes quote, “Let America be America again… the land it never has been yet.”

6 01 2011
Baby Power Dyke

@ Elizabeth

As RHS and I discussed last night, “political correctness” is like a “peanut.” Neither a pea nor a nut. It has nothing to do with politics and it’s frequently wrong.

The point about the version being released because it made some white people uncomfortable is a good one.
I think that it was making some white people uncomfortable because many of them lack the vocabulary to discuss race and privilege in a way that is beneficial in personal circles and, for teachers, in the classroom.

The people who support this move believe that they are protecting the children – that they are preserving them from having to encounter the word and come to terms with the world in which Huck lived – a world that they believe has passed.
But many of the children that they are trying to protect won’t hear or read the word for the first time in a novel by Mark Twain. They will have been called it, they will have seen it on the posters at Tea Party rallies or they will have used to qualify someone else. They have to be brave enough to withstand the word in their own lives.

Educators, parents and mentors should be brave enough to provide a room for dialogue about it.

12 04 2011

I bet it was hard for you to do bpd – but I respect ya for doing it!

I HATE political correctness (if that makes sense) and I’ve struggled with the reason why; other than to say it does no bloody good, if all your doing is making stuff correct for the sake of it! Does that make sense?

I think though – you’ve nailed it on the head for me! It frustrates the hell out of me to think that if we just say it nicely (where what we mean is ‘differently’ – and thats the point isn’t it?!) , it’ll cease to be!

I’m going to carry around your premise some and I reckon I’m going to enjoy ambushing some poor unsuspecting fella with it later!
(I bet sooner, rather than later!)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: